The post Sam Bankman-Fried Appeals Fraud Conviction, Claims Innocence Over Missing $8 Billion in FTX Funds appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.

Sam Bankman-Fried, the former CEO of the now-defunct crypto exchange FTX, has launched an appeal to overturn his fraud conviction. He contends that the accusations related to the mismanagement of $8 billion of customer funds are unjust. Bankman-Fried’s appeal highlights alleged judicial biases and procedural errors that might have affected the trial’s fairness. Sam Bankman-Fried has filed an appeal seeking to overturn his fraud conviction, asserting innocence and pointing out alleged judicial errors. Sam Bankman-Fried Seeks Retrial In March of this year, Sam Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison after being found guilty on seven counts of fraud, including accusations of defrauding FTX customers out of $8 billion. However, Bankman-Fried has recently filed a comprehensive 102-page appeal with the court, requesting a new trial. He asserts that Judge Lewis Kaplan’s decisions during the trial prevented him from mounting an adequate defense, suggesting a preconceived bias against him. This appeal could impact future legal strategies within the crypto industry. Allegations of Judicial Bias Bankman-Fried’s legal team points to multiple rulings by Judge Kaplan that they argue were prejudicial and hindered a fair defense. According to his attorneys, the judge’s actions suggest he had already presumed Bankman-Fried’s guilt before the trial began. This, they claim, undermined the integrity of the judicial process, potentially influencing the trial’s outcome. Such allegations, if substantiated, could lead to significant changes in how cases involving complex financial instruments are handled in the courts. Claims of Customer Fund Security Despite the conviction, Bankman-Fried continues to assert his innocence, arguing that he did not misappropriate customer funds. He maintains that the FTX customers have not lost their money, citing ongoing bankruptcy proceedings aimed at reimbursing the affected clients. His defense hinges on the argument that mismanagement or operational errors should not equate to criminal fraud, urging the…

---

Filed under: News - @ September 13, 2024 10:17 pm