Hyperliquid faces $340M USDC outflows amid JELLY controversy
The post Hyperliquid faces $340M USDC outflows amid JELLY controversy appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
Hyperliquid has seen over $340 million in USDC outflows following a controversy surrounding JELLY, a token that surged 429% before being delisted. According to data from blockchain analytics firm Parsec, the latest outflows happened within hours of the JELLY liquidation event, echoing a similar $300 million outflows seen during a previous Bitcoin (BTC) whale liquidation event. As a result, Hyperliquid’s (HYPE) USDC reserves have fallen from a high of $2.58 billion to $2.02 billion over the past 30 days. Hyperliquid USDC outflows/inflows. Credit: Parsec The JELLY controversy began when Hyperliquid’s treasury assumed a $5 million short position in JELLY. As the token’s price unexpectedly spiked, the unrealized loss grew to $10.63 million. If JELLY had reached $0.17, Hyperliquid’s treasury faced a potential $240 million loss. The price spike appears to have been manipulated. An address identified as 0xde95 opened a massive 430 million JELLY short position on HyperliquidX, only to remove its margin shortly after. This action led to a series of liquidations, with the losses being absorbed by Hyperliquid’s treasury. Another wallet, 0x20e8, opened a long position in JELLY at the same time, which caused the price to rise even more. To stop additional harm, Hyperliquid’s validator committee decided to delist JELLY and force-settled it at $0.0095. The platform assured users that short positions were settled at their initial entry price and that the Hyper Foundation would fully compensate impacted users. However, the manner in which the incident was handled has drawn criticism. Bitget CEO Gracy Chen called Hyperliquid’s actions “immature, unethical and unprofessional,” drawing comparisons to FTX. According to Chen, the platform functions less like a decentralized platform and more like an unregulated offshore exchange. #Hyperliquid may be on track to become #FTX 2.0. The way it handled the $JELLY incident was immature, unethical, and unprofessional, triggering user…
Filed under: News - @ March 27, 2025 3:24 am