Paxos Blames Internal Error for $300 Trillion PYUSD Stablecoin Mint
TLDR
Paxos mistakenly minted $300 trillion worth of PYUSD stablecoins on the Ethereum blockchain.
The minting error was identified and corrected within minutes as Paxos burned the entire amount.
Paxos confirmed the incident was due to an internal technical issue and not a security breach.
Industry leaders expressed concern over the error and questioned Paxos’ operational controls.
Paxos is currently seeking a national trust charter under the GENIUS Act while facing increased scrutiny.
A Paxos transaction stunned the crypto world after $300 trillion worth of PYUSD was accidentally minted on Ethereum. The massive mint happened within seconds, yet the entire amount was burned just over 20 minutes later. Paxos blamed the issue on an internal error and confirmed that no user funds were at risk.
Paxos Acknowledges Technical Error Behind PYUSD Mint
Paxos confirmed the unexpected mint was an internal transfer error and assured there was no breach or hack involved. “This was an internal technical error,” Paxos stated on X, addressing confusion over the sudden $300 trillion mint. The company acted quickly and burned the tokens by sending them to a non-retrievable Ethereum address.
At 3:12 PM EST, Paxos mistakenly minted excess PYUSD as part of an internal transfer. Paxos immediately identified the error and burned the excess PYUSD.
This was an internal technical error. There is no security breach. Customer funds are safe. We have addressed the root…
— Paxos (@Paxos) October 15, 2025
The on-chain transaction occurred at 3:12 PM EST, with all tokens destroyed shortly thereafter. Paxos said it identified the error immediately and addressed the underlying cause. There was no indication of system compromise or foul play from external parties.
Prior to the mint, Paxos executed two separate transactions for 300 million PYUSD each, which reduced and moved supply. This gave observers reason to suspect the trillions were created by mistake, not malicious activity. The mint cost only $2.66 in Ethereum gas fees, despite its astronomical figure.
Industry Reacts to Unprecedented Stablecoin Blunder
The crypto industry responded swiftly on social media with both alarm and sarcasm over the incident. Some joked that Paxos had printed enough stablecoins to pay off the entire U.S. national debt. Others mocked the scale by referencing crypto memes about “trillions” in token supply.
Concerns soon replaced humor as many questioned Paxos’ internal controls and testing procedures. Gnosis founder Martin Köppelmann remarked, “Certainly not a good look to get the decimals wrong.” Industry leaders stressed the importance of accuracy when handling programmable money at scale.
Amanda Fischer from Better Markets raised regulatory questions over the error’s implications. “If someone with a fat finger error can increase the total supply… then perhaps regulators should proceed cautiously,” she said. The comment highlighted rising scrutiny over stablecoin operators seeking federal charters.
Stablecoin Oversight in Focus as Paxos Seeks National Charter
Paxos is currently pursuing a national trust charter from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency under the GENIUS Act. The approval would grant Paxos the ability to operate across the U.S. as a federally chartered institution. This minting error could now prompt deeper review of Paxos’ technical safeguards.
PayPal has not issued a formal comment, though it partnered with Paxos to launch PYUSD earlier this year. Paxos pointed reporters to its public statement on X, confirming it had no further comment. The stablecoin issuer reiterated that customer assets remain unaffected by the incident.
As one of the largest stablecoin issuers, Paxos faces increasing regulatory and public scrutiny. This mishap has added pressure on Paxos to reinforce its operational controls. Meanwhile, industry watchers await further actions by regulators reviewing the firm’s charter request.
The post Paxos Blames Internal Error for $300 Trillion PYUSD Stablecoin Mint appeared first on Blockonomi.
Filed under: Bitcoin - @ October 15, 2025 10:28 pm