TLDR

XRP and Cardano have already solved key blockchain issues that TradFi is just realizing.
Both XRP and Cardano offer solutions in compliance and settlement that others lack.
Hoskinson highlights the infrastructure maturity of XRP and Cardano over TradFi models.
XRP and Cardano’s early focus on decentralized systems puts them ahead of legacy finance.

Charles Hoskinson recently highlighted the significant advancements made by XRP and Cardano in blockchain infrastructure, noting that these networks are already achieving what traditional finance is still trying to do, but on a scale 100 times larger. He emphasized that it’s not about the price hype but the depth of development, as XRP and Cardano have operationalized decentralized settlement and compliance solutions that others are only now beginning to explore.

XRP and Cardano: Leaders in Blockchain Innovation

Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano, recently pointed out the immense strides made by both XRP and Cardano in blockchain infrastructure. He believes that these two networks are not only ahead of their competitors, but they have also reached a level of development that others in the industry are still striving to achieve.

According to Hoskinson, the real differentiating factor is not just the market value or hype surrounding XRP and Cardano, but the depth of their infrastructure and the innovative solutions they offer.

I love it when I see legacy finance come together with Canton and try to build what XRP and Midnight are already doing at a scale 100x beyond their ambitions.

These guys never learn and don’t understand what makes Web3 unique and meaningful.

— Charles Hoskinson (@IOHK_Charles) December 26, 2025

Hoskinson’s assessment focuses on how XRP and Cardano have already operationalized decentralized settlement, identity management, and compliance-aware design, years ahead of what traditional finance (TradFi) is attempting to do now. “XRP and Cardano are doing what others are trying to do at a scale 100 times larger,” he said, underlining the difference in approach between Web3-native projects and institutional rebrands of decentralized concepts.

Mature Infrastructure of XRP and Cardano

One of Hoskinson’s key arguments is that both XRP and Cardano have well-established infrastructure. He compares them to TradFi-led initiatives that are now rediscovering the same solutions but with stricter governance, permissioning, and longer development cycles.

XRP, for example, was built with a high-throughput, low-cost settlement model at its core, designed to support institutional transactions. Cardano, on the other hand, has focused on a regulated-friendly model that ensures compliance without sacrificing decentralization.

Both projects have developed systems that prioritize scalability, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency—elements that are crucial for the mainstream adoption of blockchain technology. Hoskinson points out that these networks have resolved issues such as institutional settlement and privacy, which many competitors are only beginning to recognize as essential.

The Disparity in Development Approach

Hoskinson’s observations emphasize the differences between XRP and Cardano’s approach to blockchain development compared to that of traditional finance. While XRP and Cardano have established systems in place, many traditional financial institutions are still working on integrating decentralized finance (DeFi) models into their existing structures.

However, as Hoskinson notes, these institutions often confuse control with innovation, and their projects are often marked by slower iterations and limited flexibility.

In contrast, XRP and Cardano were built to address decentralized and privacy-conscious solutions at a global scale. The XRP Ledger, for example, was designed specifically for institutional settlement with a focus on speed and low cost. Cardano, with its formal verification stack, extended UTXO model, and on-chain governance, is well ahead of other enterprise chains that still rely on off-chain guarantees and trusted validators.

XRP and Cardano: A 100x Advantage

The concept of “100x” stems from the scale and maturity of XRP and Cardano’s infrastructure, according to Hoskinson. While legacy finance is still grappling with these concepts, projects like Canton and other TradFi-led initiatives are only beginning to explore the same challenges. 

Hoskinson believes that the longer iteration cycles and strict governance frameworks of these traditional projects will delay their ability to keep pace with the blockchain evolution driven by Web3-native solutions like XRP and Cardano.

Hoskinson’s comments underscore the fact that both XRP and Cardano have solved many of the problems that traditional finance is only now beginning to address. These projects, while not the focus of speculative hype, have laid a strong foundation for the future of decentralized finance. The next step will be the broader adoption of these mature blockchain models, as institutions realize the value of integrating with systems that already meet their needs.

The post Charles Hoskinson Says XRP and Cardano Ahead in Web3 Infrastructure appeared first on CoinCentral.

---

Filed under: News - @ December 26, 2025 3:28 pm