TLDR

Peter Schiff rejects Bitcoin as a global reserve, calling it a speculative asset.
Schiff claims Bitcoin lacks intrinsic value and compares it to past financial manias.
Schiff warns Bitcoin’s volatility makes it unsuitable for central bank use.
Peter Schiff suggests Bitcoin’s value is tied to speculation rather than fundamentals.

Peter Schiff, the long-time advocate for gold, reasserted his critical stance on Bitcoin in a recent interview with Tucker Carlson. Schiff maintains that Bitcoin will never become the world’s reserve currency, emphasizing that its value is based on speculation rather than intrinsic worth. He argued that the cryptocurrency industry seeks government regulation to gain legitimacy rather than self-regulation.

Peter Schiff argues that Bitcoin isn’t real money because it lacks intrinsic value, is highly volatile, and depends more on speculation than stability. From his perspective, that makes it unsuitable as a central bank reserve asset, especially compared with gold. He points to the… pic.twitter.com/M1jXXd9IsE

— EndGame Macro (@onechancefreedm) January 27, 2026

Schiff is known for his strong belief in the value of gold as money, and his comments reflected this position. He suggests Bitcoin’s volatility and lack of tangible value make it unsuitable for long-term, stable financial systems. The interview sparked renewed debate over Bitcoin’s place in the global economy.

Schiff Criticizes Bitcoin’s Lack of Intrinsic Value

Schiff reiterated that Bitcoin’s value does not come from any intrinsic worth, unlike gold. “Most people buying Bitcoin are just hoping to sell it later for more dollars,” Schiff explained. He sees Bitcoin primarily as a speculative asset, driven by the expectation of profit rather than its utility in global commerce.

According to Schiff, Bitcoin’s value is entirely dependent on future buyers willing to pay more dollars for it. In his view, this makes Bitcoin more akin to a financial bubble, much like past speculative manias such as the Dutch tulip craze or Beanie Babies in the 1990s.

Schiff’s criticism stems from his long-standing argument that true money must have inherent value. He contrasts this with fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar and digital assets like Bitcoin, which he believes are ultimately unstable because their value is based on confidence, not tangible substance.

Calls for Regulation and Government Support

Schiff also discussed the growing calls within the cryptocurrency industry for government regulation. He argued that the push for regulatory clarity is not aimed at restraining the industry but rather at gaining government endorsement.

According to Schiff, a formal regulatory framework would allow Bitcoin proponents to claim state validation, which could encourage more investors to buy into the asset. Schiff also warned that this might lead to government bailouts, citing proposals like a U.S. Bitcoin strategic reserve that could potentially use taxpayer funds to support the cryptocurrency market.

Schiff did not provide concrete evidence of these claims but suggested that early Bitcoin investors, who gained substantial profits, may have used their financial leverage to influence political decisions. The idea of a taxpayer-funded Bitcoin reserve, he stated, could be a future risk.

Bitcoin’s Unsuitability as a Reserve Asset

In response to Carlson’s suggestion that Bitcoin or stablecoins like Tether could be used as a global reserve asset, Schiff firmly disagreed. He maintained that Bitcoin’s extreme price volatility would make it impossible for central banks to adopt it as a stable reserve asset. “Central banks need stability, and Bitcoin’s wild price swings would destabilize any financial system,” he said.

Schiff noted that some governments and sovereign wealth funds have made small investments in Bitcoin-related assets, but he argued these moves are driven by the performance pressure of the financial markets rather than conviction in the cryptocurrency’s long-term potential. Schiff believes that as Bitcoin’s speculative nature becomes clearer, institutional interest will decline.

Schiff pointed to Bitcoin’s performance relative to gold, noting that Bitcoin has declined by approximately 40% in value over the past four years when measured in gold terms. This, he argued, further supports his view that Bitcoin is a passing financial trend rather than a legitimate store of value.

The post Peter Schiff Criticizes Bitcoin’s Lack Of Intrinsic Value In Carlson Interview appeared first on CoinCentral.

---

Filed under: News - @ January 27, 2026 3:26 am