Dips are not a side effect in crypto. They are a core feature of how the Bitcoin market clears leverage, resets sentiment, and rotates ownership from short-term traders to longer-term holders.

Historically, Bitcoin has moved in cycles that include sharp drawdowns from prior peaks. Research notes from NYDIG outline repeated cycle drawdowns that reach 75% or more peak-to-trough in prior eras, even as long-term adoption expands. In practice, that history means a “dip” can be a mild pullback or a deep multi-month drawdown, depending on where the market sits in its cycle.

A useful mental model is to treat dips as a function of forced selling.

When leverage builds, prices can rise quickly, but they also become fragile. If price breaks below common collateral or liquidation thresholds, forced selling accelerates. That dynamic is not unique to crypto, but it is amplified in Bitcoin because derivatives are large, global, and trade 24/7.

Dips also tend to cluster. A first drop often triggers liquidations, then a relief bounce follows, then another leg lower happens if liquidity stays thin or if macro conditions remain risk-off. That pattern explains why “buying the dip” can work over a long horizon, yet fail in the short term when executed with poor sizing.

Drawdown charts such as Bitbo’s overview of Bitcoin’s percent drawdown from all-time highs help visualize the range of historical declines and recoveries over time. CoinMarketCap’s historical price data also shows how quickly price can reset after peaks and how long recoveries can take.

Time horizon is the decisive variable.

Short-horizon dip buyers are often trying to time a bounce. That requires a view on positioning, liquidity, and catalysts. Long-horizon dip buyers are usually executing an accumulation plan. That approach can survive being early because the decision is driven by conviction and risk sizing rather than precision timing.

In other words, “buy bitcoin dip” works best as a process, not as a single trade. When it becomes a single all-in decision, it turns into a timing bet.

Risk vs Reward at Current Levels

“Right now” needs a concrete snapshot. On February 6, 2026, Bitcoin trades in the mid-$60,000 range after a sharp selloff week that briefly pushed price near $60,000, as described in a Feb 6, 2026 crypto market snapshot. The same week also features notable volatility in risk assets and crypto ETFs, with coverage highlighting how quickly sentiment can flip when prices break major levels.

This current regime changes the risk profile. The market is not only reacting to spot demand. It is reacting to leverage unwind, ETF flow pressure, and broader risk appetite.

The upside case

The upside case is simple and mostly structural.

Bitcoin has a fixed supply policy and a known issuance schedule, with the last halving occurring on April 20, 2024 at block 840,000, and the next expected halving projected for 2028, as summarized in CoinGecko’s halving reference page. That supply schedule does not guarantee higher prices, but it can matter when demand returns.

Bitcoin also remains the most liquid and widely integrated crypto asset. That liquidity tends to attract capital first during risk-on rotations and tends to recover faster than smaller assets when confidence rebuilds.

The reward side is therefore tied to a basic thesis: if Bitcoin’s long-term adoption arc continues, dips can represent opportunities for long-horizon accumulation. That is why the search phrase “should i buy bitcoin now” tends to spike during fast selloffs. It reflects the belief that volatility creates entry windows.

The downside case

The downside case is also straightforward.

First, leverage can keep unwinding. When liquidation cascades take over, price can overshoot lower than fundamentals suggest. Open interest and leverage conditions often matter as much as spot flows in those windows, and venues like CME provide open interest and volume references for regulated futures markets.

Second, ETF flows can amplify moves. When risk-off sentiment hits, regulated wrappers can see rapid outflows that translate into spot selling pressure, or at least reduce marginal demand. Public trackers such as Farside’s daily spot bitcoin ETF flow table and CoinGlass ETF dashboards provide a view into the direction of ETF flows over time.

Third, macro conditions remain a gating factor. Bitcoin often behaves like a high-beta asset during stress. When equities sell off and liquidity tightens, capital tends to reduce exposure to volatile instruments first.

A practical risk-reward framework

A practical way to evaluate risk vs reward at current levels is to break the decision into three questions.

Is the goal long-horizon accumulation or short-horizon timing? If the goal is long-horizon accumulation, the decision becomes a position sizing question. If the goal is short-horizon timing, the decision becomes a volatility and liquidity question.

Is liquidity needed soon? If liquidity is needed within months, buying a volatile asset during a drawdown can increase forced selling risk. If liquidity is not needed, drawdowns become easier to tolerate.

Is the plan resilient to a second leg lower? Bitcoin has historically produced multi-leg drawdowns. Any allocation that fails if price drops another 20%-30% is not an allocation. It is a leveraged bet, even if leverage is not used.

This is where bitcoin investment timing becomes less about finding the bottom and more about selecting a strategy that still works if the market remains unstable.

What Long-Term Holders Are Doing

Long-term holder behavior matters because Bitcoin ownership is not evenly distributed across time horizons. Short-term holders tend to sell during volatility. Long-term holders tend to hold through volatility, and they often become the marginal buyers when sentiment resets.

A common industry definition for long-term holders uses a holding period threshold of approximately 155 days, which Glassnode documents in its long and short-term holder supply guide and reinforces in its research on coin life cycle behavior.

That framework is useful because it maps onto behavior.

Coins held beyond that threshold are statistically less likely to move. When a large share of supply stays dormant, sell pressure can decline, and the market’s tradable float becomes smaller than headline supply numbers suggest.

During deep drawdowns, long-term holders often behave in one of two ways.

In a confidence drawdown, long-term holders continue to hold and sometimes add. That can stabilize price because sell pressure is absorbed.

In a regime shift drawdown, long-term holders can distribute to the market. That usually happens later, after a long rally, when profits are large and the desire to de-risk increases.

“Right now” sits closer to a confidence test than a mature distribution phase if the market is still digesting a recent peak and a sharp multi-month decline. Public discussions around recent volatility also point to a leverage unwind dynamic, where forced selling and futures-driven liquidation cascades spill into spot markets, as discussed in research notes such as Bitwise’s volatility overhang commentary.

What this means for decision-making is simple.

If long-term holders remain patient, the market can transition from panic selling to range building. If long-term holders begin distributing aggressively, recoveries can stall.

Long-term holder behavior does not need to be guessed. It can be monitored through onchain analytics and supply-held metrics. The goal is not to predict every move. The goal is to avoid making a short-horizon decision while pretending it is a long-term allocation.

One practical reality is that long-term holders are not a single group. Some are retail, some are funds, some are treasuries, and some are early miners. They respond to different incentives. That diversity is why Bitcoin’s market can be resilient over time, but still experience brutal drawdowns during leverage resets.

Mistakes Retail Investors Make

Retail investors often lose money on Bitcoin not because Bitcoin fails, but because the execution process is fragile.

Treating a dip like a single moment

Many buyers treat dips as one perfect entry point. That mindset creates all-in decisions at emotionally charged moments. A better approach is to treat dips as a window with multiple entries. That reduces the need to be exactly right.

Buying without an exit or hold plan

A buyer who has no plan is forced into reactive decisions. A plan does not need to be complex. It can be as simple as defining a time horizon, a maximum allocation, and a rule for adding or pausing.

Without a plan, a buyer turns normal volatility into a personal crisis, which is when bad decisions happen.

Confusing spot exposure with leveraged exposure

Many retail losses come from leverage, even when leverage is indirect. Perpetual futures, margin, and high-risk derivatives can liquidate positions quickly. That creates forced selling at the worst possible time.

Even in spot, leverage can appear through borrowing or through over-allocation. If a portfolio cannot withstand another 20%-30% drop, it behaves like leverage.

Overreacting to headlines instead of mechanisms

Headlines can explain what happened, but they rarely explain why it happened. The “why” is often liquidity, ETF flows, and leverage. That is why a simple weekend narrative can miss the deeper drivers.

For example, a weekend market watch that highlighted a Bitcoin dip near $88,000 shows how quickly sentiment can flip across the broader market cycle, and it also shows why short-term context matters when making timing decisions.

Blindly automating trades

Automation can help manage risk, but it can also magnify mistakes. Retail investors often deploy automation without understanding failure modes.

Tools and strategies described in guides on trading bots can be useful for disciplined execution, but only when they are used with strict permissions, clear risk limits, and a plan that survives volatility.

Ignoring operational and behavioral risk

Operational risk is still one of the largest retail failure points.

Poor custody practices, weak account security, and rushed transactions during volatility cause losses that have nothing to do with price direction. Behavioral risk adds another layer. FOMO buying after rallies and panic selling after drops usually produces the opposite of the intended result.

A simple fix is to treat Bitcoin purchases as a portfolio construction decision rather than a social decision. That framing reduces emotional reactivity.

This content is informational and does not provide financial advice. Risk tolerance and personal circumstances vary.

For more market context and related coverage categories, browsing additional market topics can help keep decisions grounded in broader trend signals rather than a single headline.

Conclusion

Whether someone should buy Bitcoin right now depends on time horizon, liquidity needs, and tolerance for continued volatility. Historically, Bitcoin dips can recover strongly over long horizons, but they can also deepen and persist when leverage unwinds and risk appetite remains weak.

At current levels in early February 2026, the market shows signs of a volatility regime where ETF flows, leverage resets, and macro sentiment can move price quickly. Long-term holders, often defined by a 155-day holding threshold in Glassnode’s framework, tend to provide a stabilizing base when they remain patient, while retail outcomes often depend on avoiding classic execution errors.

A durable bitcoin investment timing approach focuses on process: sizing that can survive another leg lower, a plan that does not rely on perfect bottoms, and decisions driven by liquidity and risk mechanics rather than emotion.

The post Should You Buy Bitcoin Right Now? appeared first on Crypto Adventure.

---

Filed under: Bitcoin - @ February 6, 2026 1:28 pm