: Does the Future Hold for ?

The crypto world is buzzing with a major debate among top venture capitalists. Leading investors are clashing online over one big question: Do non-financial use cases in Web3, like social media, gaming, and identity tools, have a real future? Or have they already failed? This fiery exchange reveals deep divides in how VCs view the path forward for blockchain beyond simple money apps.

The Spark: Chris Dixon’s Bold Defense

It all started on a recent Friday when Chris Dixon, a general partner at a16z crypto, published a detailed article. Dixon argues that non-financial apps in Web3 have struggled to grow not because of flaws in the ideas themselves, but due to external roadblocks. He points to years of scams, shady actors exploiting users, and strict regulations from governments as the main culprits holding back progress.

Imagine decentralized social platforms where you truly own your data and connections. Or secure digital identity systems stored safely on blockchain. Picture streaming services free from Big Tech control, tools for managing digital rights, and Web3 games where players own their in-game items as NFTs. These visions promise a more open internet, but Dixon says outside forces have slowed them down.

The Counterpunch: Haseeb Qureshi’s Harsh Reality Check

Not everyone buys Dixon’s story. Haseeb Qureshi, managing partner at Dragonfly Capital, hit back hard on Sunday. In a blunt response, he declared that non-financial use cases for crypto have failed because “no one wants them.” Qureshi stresses a lack of genuine user demand and poor product-market fit. In simple terms, these apps do not solve everyday problems that people value enough to use or pay for regularly.

Dixon fired back, highlighting that a16z crypto funds are designed for the long haul—at least 10 years. “Building entirely new industries takes time,” he noted. Patient capital allows bets on transformative shifts that may take years to pay off, much like early internet investments.

Nic Carter Joins the Fray: Time is Money in VC

Then came Nic Carter, founder of Castle Island Ventures, siding firmly with Qureshi. Carter argues that VCs do not have the luxury of endlessly “waiting to be right.” Most funds must deploy capital within 2-3 years to stay competitive. Investors need to identify hot markets quickly or risk being left behind by faster-moving opportunities.

This clash spotlights two clear investment philosophies in crypto: the patient builders at firms like a16z, who dream of a full Web3 revolution, versus more pragmatic players chasing immediate, proven returns.

Where is VC Money Flowing in 2025?

This debate heats up as venture capital floods back into crypto in 2025. But the money is not spreading evenly. Most funding targets tokenized real-world assets (RWAs)—things like real estate, bonds, private credit, and art digitized as blockchain tokens. These are seen as safe, backed by real value, and easy to trade globally.

DeFi protocols, user-friendly wallets, and stablecoins are also raking in big investments. Why? They deliver results today. Billions of dollars flow through trading, lending, and borrowing on these platforms daily. In contrast, non-financial apps generate tiny revenue fractions compared to financial tools.

Trends back this up: Web3 investments are shifting from basic blockchains to polished wallets and DeFi apps. Finance is leading the charge, proving its dominance in the current landscape.

Portfolio Playbooks: How Top Firms Bet

Dragonfly Capital: Focuses on financial infrastructure. Stars in their portfolio include protocols for seamless on-chain value transfer and risk management, like advanced trading platforms and liquidity tools.
a16z Crypto: Balances proven finance winners like Coinbase and Uniswap with bolder non-financial bets in gaming, social media, and creator tools—the exact areas Dixon champions.
Castle Island Ventures: Prioritizes scalable financial innovations with quick market traction.

Signs of Hope Amid the Doom?

Not all non-financial Web3 is written off. Decentralized social networks (DeSoc) are picking up steam, attracting users fed up with Big Tech censorship and data grabs. Projects like Lens Protocol enable user-owned social profiles that you can take anywhere. Farcaster is emerging as a decentralized rival to Twitter, with growing daily active users.

In gaming, Axie Infinity showed the power of play-to-earn before its crash, proving players will engage when they can own and monetize assets. Other titles on layer-2 chains like Base and Optimism are rebounding, with gaming tokens gaining value.

Failures abound too. Many DeSoc apps faded due to low user numbers and clunky interfaces. Streaming platforms like Audius battle giants like Spotify on scale and content discovery.

The Missing Piece: User Experience is Key

A core insight from this debate? Non-financial Web3 needs better UX. Apps must feel as smooth as Web2 services—think Instagram or TikTok—but powered by crypto perks like true ownership, portability, and resistance to bans. Hide the blockchain complexity behind simple, intuitive designs, and users might flock.

Layer-2 solutions are helping here, slashing fees and speeding transactions to make social dApps viable. 2025 data shows RWA deals at record highs, but social apps on these chains are multiplying too.

Why This Debate Shapes Web3’s Destiny

VCs control billions in funding, so their views matter hugely. If finance keeps dominating, Web3 risks becoming just “Web-Fin”—a fancy layer for trading and lending. Dixon’s long-game vision insists true decentralization demands thriving non-financial apps to create a full internet alternative.

The clash boils down to now versus later. Dragonfly and Castle Island hunt today’s winners. a16z bets on tomorrow’s Web3 giants.

What Users Will Decide

Ultimately, users hold the power. If decentralized social platforms or Web3 games deliver real fun, value, and seamless experiences, VCs will pivot to fund them. Track metrics like daily active users, retention, and organic growth—the true tests of product-market fit.

Web3 stands at a crossroads: Double down on finance or build out the complete decentralized web? As this rages on, one thing is clear—the future of non-financial use cases hangs in the balance.

Stay tuned for more updates on the evolving Web3 landscape.

Discuss this news on our Telegram Community. Subscribe to us on Google news and do follow us on Twitter @Blockmanity

Did you like the news you just read? Please leave a feedback to help us serve you better

Disclaimer: Blockmanity is a news portal and does not provide any financial advice. Blockmanity’s role is to inform the cryptocurrency and blockchain community about what’s going on in this space. Please do your own due diligence before making any investment. Blockmanity won’t be responsible for any loss of funds.

The post Crypto VCs in Fiery Clash: Does the Future Hold for Non-Financial Web3 Use Cases? appeared first on Blockmanity.

---

Filed under: Altcoins - @ February 9, 2026 2:32 am