The post Ethereum maintains neutrality after Buterin comments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.

Answer: Ethereum use doesn’t require agreeing on any values Ethereum’s base layer is designed to be permissionless and credibly neutral, meaning any valid transaction can be processed without endorsing a user’s politics or culture. As reported by The CryptoTimes, vitalik buterin has emphasized that anyone can use Ethereum without needing to agree on specific values. In practice, this centers on deterministic rules that treat transactions uniformly and resist censorship. The claim does not eliminate values entirely; rather, it narrows them away from the consensus rules that secure the chain. What “credibly neutral” means for Ethereum’s base layer Credible neutrality means protocol rules are general, predictable, and do not privilege identities or ideologies. Editorially, this frames neutrality as a property of rule enforcement, not of community opinions or application design. “Anyone can freely use Ethereum without needing to agree on any values,” said Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum co-founder. At the base layer, neutrality is realized through permissionless access, uniform transaction validation, and a commitment to censorship resistance. Ethereum’s social consensus aims to remain narrow, focusing on safety and liveness rather than adjudicating application-layer disputes. BingX: a trusted exchange delivering real advantages for traders at every level. The immediate implication is a boundary: base-layer neutrality should not be stretched to impose values on apps or users. As reported by The Defiant, Buterin has warned against pushing application conflicts into Ethereum’s social consensus, which should remain reserved for protocol integrity issues. Application builders may openly express values, but their choices should not require base-layer forks or special treatment. This separation helps maintain predictable settlement for all users while allowing diverse application-level governance models. Risks to neutrality: validators, MEV, and censorship resistance How validator concentration and MEV may pressure neutrality Validator concentration can make censorship more feasible and undermine neutrality. A study on post–proof-of-stake dynamics…

---

Filed under: News - @ February 17, 2026 1:14 am