Analysts Believe that ETH Gate Effect May Stop SEC To Drag Ripple and Its Execus to Trial
The post Analysts Believe that ETH Gate Effect May Stop SEC To Drag Ripple and Its Execus to Trial appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News
There is a wide public outrage over the SEC’s activities, and the latest flash in the pan is the SEC’s role in favoring Ethereum in the early phase. It all started with Steven Nerayoff, who has ignited widespread controversy about their potential impact. Some industry sources, including Yassin Mobarak of Dizer Capital, suggest that to protect undisclosed secrets, the SEC might avoid taking Ripple, along with its top executives, Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen, to trial.
File this under “The SEC will never take @Ripple, @bgarlinghouse , @chrislarsensf to trial”.
Ripple executives could simply call @StevenNerayoff to the stand and expose the skeletons in the SEC closet. How could these executives be expected to know, back in 2013-2018, that XRP… https://t.co/r7iQNZDzns
— Yassin Mobarak (@Dizer_YM) September 17, 2023
Probing SEC’s Association with Ethereum
Notably, Nerayoff’s allegations revolve around the SEC’s historical involvement with Ethereum, particularly during its initial coin offering (ICO) phase. He hinted at potential corruption within the SEC, difficulties in accurately identifying Ethereum ICO participants, and even personal persecution.
Former SEC Chair was Joe Grundfest who has integrity which seems out of fashion. As to the number, I now realize one can’t tell the true # of ETH ICO buyers as it was explained by some how whales could disguise their large positions during the ICO. Violation of Terms of Service… https://t.co/TjSIsszGmG
— Steven Nerayoff (@StevenNerayoff) September 17, 2023
There are now questions about the integrity of the current SEC leadership, with Nerayoff drawing comparisons to former SEC Chair Joe Grundfest. This has cast doubt on whether the agency still upholds its previously established standards. Notably, John Deaton previously lashed out at Gary Gensler’s role in manipulating risk assets, which he said went beyond their authority.
Ethereum ICO Process Was Rigged Too?
Moreover, Nerayoff pointed out that identifying Ethereum ICO investors is challenging, leading to suspicions of concealed holdings by influential investors. This raises transparency concerns about the ICO process and its potential implications for Ethereum. There are also allegations of potential Terms of Service (TOS) violations during Ethereum’s ICO phase, which could have serious consequences.
Nerayoff’s claims imply that Ethereum may have been aware of entities holding significant amounts of Ether (ETH), which challenges decentralization principles. The 2018 speech by former SEC official Bill Hinman, suggesting Ethereum’s decentralization, is noteworthy in this context. On the flip side, Nerayoff additionally alleged personal targeting and discrediting by the SEC, alongside the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI. In a very fizzy manner, the charges were dropped by the FBI, raising doubts about its role, according to John Deaton.
What’s Next in the SEC vs. Ripple Case?
Navigating the deep waters, Nerayoff’s accusations are vague, leaving room for interpretation. Industry expert John Deaton chimed in that the SEC may avoid a Ripple trial to prevent potential revelations related to Ethereum. The recent SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit ruling favored both sides but prompted an SEC appeal. These allegations find themselves at the crossroads of the SEC’s policies, potentially making ETH Gate the epitome of crypto regulation history. Ethereum’s current value stands at $1,635, and the outcome of these allegations remains uncertain.
Do you think ETHGATE is just a conspiracy, or is it true? Tell us.
Filed under: Bitcoin - @ September 18, 2023 1:21 pm