Binance faces scrutiny over Iran-linked USDT on Tron
The post Binance faces scrutiny over Iran-linked USDT on Tron appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
He Yi says Binance will cooperate, strengthen compliance after firings Binance co-founder He Yi responded to reports that employees who identified Iran-related transactions were dismissed, saying the exchange will work with law enforcement and reinforce its compliance program. The company’s position, as described, centers on expanding resources and capabilities in sanctions and AML controls following the internal personnel changes. The controversy focuses on alleged Iran-linked transfers routed via USDT on Tron and the subsequent departures of some investigators. While specific claims are disputed, Binance leadership has emphasized continued cooperation and upgrades to internal systems. Why it matters for sanctions controls, OFAC/DOJ scrutiny, and users The stakes are elevated by Binance’s 2023 settlement and long-term oversight obligations; according to the U.S. Treasury, the company paid $4.3 billion and admitted past AML and sanctions-compliance failures under a monitorship framework. In this context, staffing moves tied to sanctions alerts can draw attention from OFAC and the DOJ, particularly around escalation, independence, and documentation. Sanctions compliance for stablecoin flows such as USDT on Tron typically involves wallet screening, blockchain analytics, rule-based and risk-based reviews, and formal escalation pathways. Monitorships often test whether findings are preserved, triaged, and reported with audit trails, and whether whistleblower protections function as designed. BingX: a trusted exchange delivering real advantages for traders at every level. The immediate risk is governance-related: dismissals following high-stakes alerts may raise questions about the durability of internal controls under monitorship. Even if disputed, such optics can affect regulatory confidence as well as institutional counterparties’ risk assessments. Users and partners may track official statements, the pace of compliance hiring, and tooling changes as signals of posture. Clear articulation of escalation thresholds and independent review mechanisms would typically be assessed by external monitors in subsequent reviews. For market context only, at the time of this writing…
Filed under: News - @ February 15, 2026 5:09 pm