The post Binance Triumphs in SEC Legal Battle as Judge Cites Ripple Case to Dismiss Claims on BNB Sales appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.

The cryptocurrency community is actively discussing the recent court decision involving Binance and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The judge’s ruling in this case draws significant parallels to a previous landmark case involving Ripple. Legal experts are particularly noting Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s reliance on prior case law in dismissing certain SEC claims. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the recent Binance-SEC legal ruling, exploring its implications for the cryptocurrency market. Details of the Recent Ruling The SEC had initiated a lawsuit against Binance and its former CEO, Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, accusing them of various legal breaches, including mismanagement of customer funds and misleading stakeholders. Binance contested these claims and sought dismissal of the case. The court’s recent ruling has resulted in a mixed outcome. Out of 13 counts, 10 will proceed in their entirety, two partially, and one has been dismissed. The judge dismissed the count involving secondary sales of BNB tokens, as well as the sales of BUSD stablecoin. Legal Basis and Precedents Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s decision heavily cited the rationale used by Judge Analisa Torres in the 2023 Ripple lawsuit. This citation lent significant weight to Binance’s defense, particularly in relation to secondary market sales of BNB tokens. By referencing the Ripple case, Judge Jackson highlighted the SEC’s inability to effectively distinguish between securities and non-securities in the context of digital assets. Community and Expert Reactions The ruling has been met with a generally positive reception from the cryptocurrency community. Legal commentators, including the well-known expert “Metalawman,” have praised the decision, viewing it as a win for the industry, especially concerning secondary market sales. The expert also noted that the decision supports Coinbase’s argument for an early appeal in another digital asset case, given the inconsistent treatment of digital tokens across different court…

---

Filed under: News - @ June 30, 2024 6:28 pm