Corporate treasuries are getting Bitcoin wrong
The post Corporate treasuries are getting Bitcoin wrong appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. Recent conversations across the digital asset ecosystem — involving public-company executives, crypto infrastructure builders, professional investors, and regulators — point to a notably pragmatic shift. The focus is moving away from short-term price movements and toward how digital assets are beginning to reshape corporate finance. What became clear is that corporate treasuries are approaching an inflection point. Summary Corporate treasuries are shifting from speculation to integration: Bitcoin is moving from a passive holding to a governed, yield-bearing, auditable treasury instrument aligned with public-market controls. “Digital Asset Treasury” is emerging as a discipline: productive BTC plus tokenized RWAs (treasuries, money markets, credit) let firms manage liquidity, duration, and risk on programmable rails. The real inflection is RWA tokenization: it turns balance sheets into dynamic, software-defined systems — making capital more efficient, transparent, and continuously deployable. The question is no longer whether Bitcoin (BTC) belongs on a corporate balance sheet. Attention is shifting toward how Bitcoin, and digital assets more broadly, can be integrated into treasury frameworks in ways that align with public-market governance, liquidity management, and risk discipline. From the perspective of listed companies, this evolution is less about taking on new risk and more about adapting treasury strategy to a financial system that is becoming increasingly digital and programmable. Bitcoin is not the issue; the framework is For many years, companies approached Bitcoin conservatively, either holding it passively as a long-term store of value or choosing not to engage at all. Given the early limitations around custody, regulation, and governance, that caution was understandable. Public-company treasuries today face structural pressures. Traditional short-duration instruments struggle to deliver real returns, while excess liquidity is increasingly questioned by investors. At…
Filed under: News - @ January 8, 2026 2:29 pm