The post Court Ruling Suggests Lido DAO May Face Liability as General Partnership Under State Law appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.

The recent ruling by a federal court significantly impacts the decentralized finance (DeFi) landscape, as it establishes Lido DAO’s legal culpability under state law. This landmark decision could redefine how decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are perceived and operated within the regulatory framework, raising critical questions about liability for participants. Judge Vince Chhabria highlighted the implications of this ruling, asserting, “The lawsuit presents several new and important questions about the ability of people in the crypto world to inoculate themselves from liability by creating novel legal arrangements.” This article explores the ramifications of a federal court ruling treating Lido DAO as a general partnership, impacting legal liability in decentralized finance. Lido DAO’s Legal Classification as a General Partnership The recent verdict by the U.S. Northern District Court of California categorizes Lido DAO as a general partnership, holding that identifiable participants within the organization cannot escape liability due to its decentralized nature. This ruling challenges the existing notion that DAOs operate outside traditional legal frameworks, suggesting instead that their governance structures may subject them to conventional business laws. The judge pointed out that the DAO’s operational management by identifiable participants is integral in assigning liability, as highlighted in the ruling. Implications for Decentralization in Crypto Governance Following the court’s decision, the implications for decentralized governance are profound. Participants in these structures could now face legal repercussions akin to those in traditional corporate entities, fundamentally altering their operational dynamics. As a result, the usual protections associated with decentralized structures are in jeopardy, compelling participants to reconsider their roles and responsibilities within DAOs. This could lead to a decline in participation in such governance models due to concerns over liability. The Context Behind the Ruling The lawsuit originated from plaintiff Andrew Samuels, who purchased LDO tokens and subsequently alleged they were unregistered securities. This…

---

Filed under: News - @ November 19, 2024 6:24 am