The post Crypto Corruption Amendment’s Shocking Defeat In US Senate appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.

The world of cryptocurrency is no stranger to headlines, but a recent development in the U.S. Senate has sent ripples through the digital asset community, raising significant questions about integrity and influence. A crucial anti-crypto corruption amendment, aimed at preventing elected officials from leveraging their positions for personal gain through digital assets, met a decisive defeat, leaving many to wonder about the future of cryptocurrency ethics in government. This legislative setback highlights the complex and often contentious intersection of rapidly evolving digital finance and traditional political structures. For anyone invested in the integrity of public service and the responsible growth of the crypto space, this vote is a moment of significant reflection. What Was the Proposed Anti-Crypto Corruption Amendment? At its core, the proposed anti-crypto corruption amendment, championed by U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley, sought to draw a clear line in the sand for elected officials. Its primary objective was to prohibit public servants from actively promoting specific cryptocurrencies for what Merkley termed ‘unfair gain’ or to ‘enrich themselves’ through ‘crypto schemes.’ The intent was to safeguard against potential conflicts of interest, where an official might use their position or access to privileged information to inflate the value of digital assets they hold, thereby benefiting personally at the public’s expense. Senator Merkley’s concern, clearly articulated via X (formerly Twitter), underscored a vital principle: public office should never be a vehicle for personal financial enrichment, especially not through speculative and often opaque markets like cryptocurrency. The amendment aimed to introduce a new layer of transparency and accountability, specifically tailored to the unique characteristics of digital assets. While the exact provisions of the amendment were not detailed in the initial report, such proposals typically include: Prohibition on Promotion: Banning elected officials from publicly endorsing or promoting specific cryptocurrencies or related projects. Enhanced Disclosure:…

---

Filed under: News - @ July 1, 2025 5:25 am