FTX, a defunct cryptocurrency exchange, has filed a lawsuit worth $700 million against K5 Global, an investment firm helmed by former Clinton aide, Michael Kives. According to recent reports, FTX is alleging that its funds were improperly invested, primarily serving personal interests rather than those of the company.

Documents filed in a Wilmington, Delaware court, reveal that FTX accuses its founder, Sam Bankman-Fried, of approving the transfer of $700 million to entities connected with K5 Global. The exchange asserts that Bankman-Fried sanctioned these transactions as part of a ploy to manipulate company resources for individual enrichment.

Insights from the lawsuit disclose that Bankman-Fried depicted Kives as a person with broad political and celebrity links, labeling him as

“the most connected person I’ve ever met.”

It’s inferred from the lawsuit that Bankman-Fried used K5 Global’s connections to boost his own political and societal influence.

Despite red flags raised by FTX employees about K5 Global’s intentions, Bankman-Fried allegedly persisted in financing K5’s endeavors. This conduct, according to the lawsuit, ultimately served to benefit Kives and his co-founder, Bryan Baum, at the expense of FTX and its customers.

The court filing spotlights a controversial investment involving a shell company controlled by Bankman-Fried. It used $214 million of FTX’s funds to acquire a minority stake in Kendall Jenner’s 818 Tequila brand.

In response to the allegations, K5 Global fervently denies any wrongdoing. They assert that their dealings with Bankman-Fried and FTX were believed to be part of a mutually beneficial business partnership. A spokesperson for K5 Global underscored their commitment to a fair and long-lasting partnership.

Bankman-Fried, currently pleading not guilty to separate charges of defrauding FTX customers, faces a slew of legal battles. FTX’s new CEO, John Ray III, has hinted at the launch of a second version of the exchange. The decision to seek legal redress against K5 Global may further entangle the legal circumstances surrounding the prospective exchange.