Hands-on with underwear and ETH: what Vitalik’s laundry routine can teach us about stacking wealth
The post Hands-on with underwear and ETH: what Vitalik’s laundry routine can teach us about stacking wealth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin reveals that, despite his immense crypto fortune, he still chooses to wash his own underwear by hand—a personal detail that offers insight into his unconventional approach to both wealth and daily life. Summary In a tirade against exorbitant hotel laundry room fees, ETH founder Vitalik Buterin said that rebelling against injustice, no matter how seemingly innocuous, is a personal principle—illustrating that small acts of defiance can be meaningful statements against unfairness in everyday life. Other billionaires, like Warren Buffett and Ingvar Kamprad, have voiced similar tendencies. What these tactics can teach us about life, wealth and the philosophical underpinnings of both. When Ethereum (ETH) co-founder Vitalik Buterin confessed on social media that, due to exorbitant hotel laundry service fees, he opts to wash his own underwear by hand—he simultaneously declared that “pragmatism is wrong”—decrying the drudgery, and irony, of servicing oneself in an environment predicated on the opposite. It’s a quirky juxtaposition from a billionaire founder: a seemingly trivial domestic admission entwined with a philosophical jab at pragmatism, an American-born doctrine that attaches truth to whatever works in practice. For the uninitiated, pragmatism’s roots stretch back to the late nineteenth century, flourishing under the pens of Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and John Dewey. Their core claim is that the practical effects of an idea are what matter most. A belief, for a pragmatist, is only as good and as “true” as it is useful in guiding action. This theory, while adaptable and influential, has drawn criticism for being overly relativistic and, at worst, reducing truth to little more than subjective utility. Philosophers like Bertrand Russell accused William James of enabling conflicting beliefs to both count as “true” if each serves someone’s purpose, thus blurring the line between real insight and convenient self-delusion. The economics of…
Filed under: News - @ August 8, 2025 8:26 pm