Ripple Reaches Settlement with SEC
The post Ripple Reaches Settlement with SEC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
Ripple has finally reached a settlement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) after a drawn-out legal conflict concerning the sale of unregistered securities. Ripple agreed to pay a fine of $50 million, a sum that is considerably lower than the initially demanded $2 billion, as well as a $125 million fine from the previous year. This legal battle, which began in 2020, revolved around whether XRP sales constituted a breach of securities regulations. A temporary verdict delivered by the court in 2023 affirmed that Ripple’s corporate sales contravened securities laws, although individual transactions were deemed compliant. What Instigated the Case?How Did Developments Unfold? What Instigated the Case? The SEC filed charges against Ripple towards the end of 2020, claiming that the company sold XRP as unregistered securities. The regulatory agency asserted that Ripple ought to have registered its offerings to institutional investors as securities. However, Ripple staunchly argued that trades executed on individual platforms did not meet the definition of securities violations. How Did Developments Unfold? By 2023, a court interim ruling clarified accusations specific to corporate transactions while being lenient to individual sales. These developments, influenced by hints of policy softening during the Trump administration, opened the door to extended negotiations between Ripple and the SEC. Recent diplomatic strides ultimately led to the settlement agreement. The settlement news sparked an immediate 8.7% surge in XRP’s market value. Investors seemed hopeful for a decrease in regulatory ambiguity. Nonetheless, industry insiders remain doubtful about whether the reduced penalty would emerge as a benchmark for similar cases. It’s uncertain if the spike marks only ephemeral respite or a long-term trend. The SEC itself faced divided opinions regarding the outcome. SEC member Caroline A. Crenshaw criticized the settlement as a compromise on investor protections, cautioning that the weakened oversight could…
Filed under: News - @ May 9, 2025 8:29 am