SEC’s Recent Rollbacks Suggest Possible Shift in Regulatory Approach for Tron and Other Crypto Firms
The post SEC’s Recent Rollbacks Suggest Possible Shift in Regulatory Approach for Tron and Other Crypto Firms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
The recent regulatory changes by the U.S. SEC highlight a significant shift in the agency’s approach towards the cryptocurrency industry, showcasing a trend towards reform. The closure of lawsuits against major firms, notably Gemini, suggests a possible easing of tensions between regulators and the crypto sector. According to Cameron Winklevoss of Gemini, the SEC’s recent actions signify a critical moment, as he noted, “This decision marks the end of a long-standing conflict over regulatory clarity.” Recent SEC actions indicate a transformative period for crypto regulation, potentially easing previous conflicts and encouraging growth in the sector. Call for SEC Reforms While celebrating the closure of lawsuits, Winklevoss argued the financial burden of extensive litigation has taken a toll on his firm and others in the space. He advocated for the reimbursement of legal costs and accountability measures against certain SEC officials to deter future overreach. The Impact of Heavy Litigation “It’s wholly unacceptable for an agency like the SEC to bully, harass, and attack a lawful industry and then decide one day to simply say we’re good and walk away,” Winklevoss stated. This sentiment reflects an increasing frustration within the industry regarding the regulatory climate, where firms often face prolonged scrutiny without clarity. Lessons from ‘Operation Chokepoint’ The co-founder of Gemini cautioned that without effective measures to hold regulators accountable, the crypto industry could face continued uncertainty. He emphasized that to prevent another instance akin to ‘Operation Chokepoint’, which restricted banking access for crypto firms, it’s essential to promote transparency and accountability within the SEC. Winklevoss noted, “Operation Chokepoint didn’t stop at 1.0. It continued to 2.0 because not enough was done to hold bureaucrats accountable for their actions during 1.0. And there will be a 3.0 unless there is a real, public reckoning for 2.0.” Overview of Regulatory Changes This…
Filed under: News - @ February 27, 2025 10:23 am