UNL Validator Charges XRP Community to Intervene in AMM Amendment Voting Process
The post UNL Validator Charges XRP Community to Intervene in AMM Amendment Voting Process appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
As voting for the XLS-30D amendment is delayed, Aesthetes has urged XRP community members to call on their favorite validators to support the AMM proposal. Amid the delay in achieving consensus for the XLS-30D amendment, a proposal set to introduce an automated market maker (AMM) on the XRP Ledger, popular XRPL validator Aesthetes has called XRP community members to intervene. In a tweet yesterday, Aesthetes, which voted in favor of the amendment, provided an update about the voting process. According to the validator, while Ripple and over ten UNL validators have voted to support the amendment, 11 others have refused to support the initiative that could introduce an AMM to the leading blockchain. As a result, Aesthetes urged XRP community members to intervene by contacting their favorite project to support the amendment. XRPL Advisor Issues Warning Expectedly, Aesthetes’ tweet stirred mixed reactions among community members. While some users saw the suggestion as a welcome development, others slammed Aesthetes for encouraging XRP holders to “harass” other validators into supporting the XLS-30D amendment. Notably, Dr. Scott Branson, an advisor to the XRPL Foundation, was among those who kicked against the intervention of XRP holders. – Advertisement – Per Branson, petitioning validators to support an amendment has yet to prove effective over the years. He recounted how such actions failed to yield positive results in the past, especially during the voting for NFT amendments. “Operators are free to decide for themselves,” he warned. I doubt petitioning validator operators to harass them into supporting an amendment is productive. This happened with NFTs, and all the subsequent NFT fix amendments are now a cautionary tale of premature action. Operators are free to decide for themselves. — Dr. J. Scott Branson (@JScottBranson) December 27, 2023 In response, Aesthetes clarified that the tweet was not a call…
Filed under: News - @ December 28, 2023 1:24 pm