The post Vitalik’s “Balance of Power”: A Blueprint for Avoiding Systemic Collapse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.

TLDR:  Buterin argues that unchecked power in governments, corporations, or mobs historically leads to systemic failure. Economies of scale now outpace natural limits, making deliberate diffusion essential to preserve long-term stability. Adversarial interoperability enables users to access networks without surrendering control to centralized gatekeepers. Decentralization models must accompany business models to prevent scalable systems from becoming coercive tools. Balance of Power is framed by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin as a structural blueprint for preventing systemic collapse in an era of accelerating technological and institutional scale.  In his essay, Buterin argued that modern societies face a paradox: the same forces that drive progress also concentrate authority beyond historical limits. He warned that without intentional counterweights, innovation can amplify fragility rather than resilience.  The text positions decentralization, diffusion, and pluralistic design as practical mechanisms to sustain growth while reducing the risk of coordinated failure across political, economic, and social systems. Why Unchecked Authority Destabilizes Systems Buterin opens by addressing the persistent fear of dominant institutions. He described governments as uniquely dangerous when unrestrained, writing that “a government has the power to ruin you that far exceeds anything a corporation could do.”  Vitalik Buterin published an article, “Balance of Power,” where he emphasized that preventing the excessive concentration of power is key to avoiding societal crises while advancing technology, economy, and culture globally. He highlighted that strategies like technology… — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) December 31, 2025 For this reason, liberal traditions evolved to ensure the state behaves as a neutral framework rather than a self-directed actor. Courts, rule-based law, and divided authority exist to keep power procedural instead of personal. Corporate concentration was analyzed through a different lens. Buterin noted that large firms become highly effective optimization machines, yet optimization toward profit increasingly diverges from public interest at scale.  He observed that as…

---

Filed under: News - @ December 31, 2025 8:27 am