The post XYO Partners with Resiliocs to Add Verifiable Data Layer for Climate Risk Modelling appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.

One of the first DePIN projects, XYO, which currently has over 10 million nodes, has partnered with climate analytics platform Resiliocs to introduce a cryptographic verification layer into climate risk modelling systems. According to the company, roughly 80% of those nodes operate outside the traditional Web3 ecosystem. The collaboration aims to strengthen how environmental observations and geospatial data are recorded and verified in predictive modelling for insurers, financial institutions, and infrastructure operators. Climate modelling is becoming increasingly central to financial decision-making, yet the data pipelines feeding these models remain fragmented, lack strong oversight, and are often difficult to audit. The XYO and Resiliocs collaboration addresses part of this problem by attaching cryptographic verification to environmental data as it is captured, creating a traceable record of where and when an observation occurred. Climate risk modelling under scrutiny Climate risk intelligence platforms have become an important tool for organisations attempting to quantify exposure to physical climate hazards such as floods, wildfires, storms, and extreme heat. Resiliocs operates in this space, combining climate science, geospatial analytics, and predictive modelling to translate hazard exposure into financial impact. Its platform enables insurers, asset owners, and financial institutions to model how climate events could affect infrastructure, portfolios, and long-term asset values. However, the reliability of any modelling system depends heavily on the quality and traceability of the underlying data. Climate-related lawsuits have more than tripled globally since 2017, and in 2018, the Paradise wildfire, the most destructive in California’s history, destroyed nearly 14,000 homes and ultimately left PG&E facing roughly $30 billion in settlement costs.     Investigations later revealed that corrosion risks and ageing infrastructure concerns had been documented before the disaster. The case raised questions about how risk signals were recorded, shared, and escalated within organisations. In high-stakes incidents like these, accountability often turns on records, specifically…

---

Filed under: News - @ March 5, 2026 5:22 pm